🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often spent years building community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to establish different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.